Frugal not the same as cheap
Not that my dad was ever a tightwad, but lots of things he bought cost the least. Clothes, infrequent restaurant meals and especially gasoline—he’d go out of his way to stop for cheap gas regardless of the station’s brand or status.
So on our trips I visited a lot of restrooms that were hardly nicer than the little shack out back.
Dining out always featured the blue plate special and never the steak or even a shake. And of course, as a youngster I never got to see one of his tax returns, which surely must have been quite imaginative.
Besides, aside from having a nice inheritance to thank him for, I agree with old Calvin Coolidge’s assertion that, "There is no dignity quite so impressive, and no independence so important, as living within your means."
Dad certainly did, and his frugality has affected my own adult behavior. I shop at Wal-Mart. I still buy cheap shoes, reminiscent of those thrifty Thom McAn’s of old. When possible, I fill up the tank down in Fredericksburg.
Frugality is also a major reason I have opposed measures to fight global warming. All of them seem terribly expensive, with not the least assurance of being the least bit effective. As noted climate skeptic Bjorn Lomborg has claimed, choosing the kind of future Al Gore advocates could cost, according to U.N. estimates, $553 trillion over this century—leaving in 2100 the average world inhabitant 30 percent poorer.
Frugality is why I also enjoy living in Virginia, which lately spends too freely, but at least still feels guilty about it. Our taxes are still low and we get a good bang for the buck, excepting of course our roads.
Closer to home, I hope the electric company can come up with a way to supply the needed extra power lines to assure we’ll continue to have very few blackouts here. If stringing their lines from new tall towers is the only way to keep my future electric bills from ballooning, so be it. I know the highlines are ungainly, but cheap is seldom pretty.
* Up in Washington, frugality be damned seems to be par for the course. I just wish they wouldn’t fritter away so many of our tax dollars. From representatives’ “earmarks” that fund pet projects to huge cost overruns such as in the Katrina recovery and the war in Iraq, spending is wildly out of control.
* And so glaringly ineffective. GAO recently reported that Homeland Security hasn’t even completed a risk assessment of our rail system, a preferred target of terrorists who have hit railroads in London and Madrid and India recently.
N And so dumb it’s beyond belief. Congress has just eased the repayment terms on students’ college loans and thus given our fat institutions of higher learning further reasons to keep hiking their outlandish tuition charges.
Come to think of it, government’s gross mismanagement may be one reason why billionaire Warren Buffett has already allocated much of his huge estate to favored charities. They surely will spend his money more prudently than the government, which otherwise would grab much of his wealth via estate taxes, but now won’t.
Now here come the Democrats and especially Jim Webb, our new senator so abundantly full of himself, wailing about how unfair it is that we aren’t all rich. If we were, don’t you see, then Congress could get lots more money through income taxes.
“The problem with political jokes is that they get elected.” –Will Rogers.
Webb carps about how a few rich CEOs make so much more than the rest of us. Make them all work for free? That wouldn’t cause even a wiggle in the gap between the rich and poor.
Speaking of which, Congress' Joint Economic Committee measures income inequality by something called the Gini Index.Today it’s the same as when Bush took office. (Hat tip to blogger Gerry Phelps.) But don’t take our word for it. E-mail me and I’ll send you a persuasive piece by hotshot analyst Alan Reynolds.
One final point: Frugal doesn’t mean cheap. Indeed, it’s claimed that conservative Americans give a lot more to charity and churches than liberals do.
We’re frugal, they’re cheap.
*****
(Note to Bensblurb aficionados: You can see some of my recent columns. Try blogger.com and click on
"You should see this.")
So on our trips I visited a lot of restrooms that were hardly nicer than the little shack out back.
Dining out always featured the blue plate special and never the steak or even a shake. And of course, as a youngster I never got to see one of his tax returns, which surely must have been quite imaginative.
Besides, aside from having a nice inheritance to thank him for, I agree with old Calvin Coolidge’s assertion that, "There is no dignity quite so impressive, and no independence so important, as living within your means."
Dad certainly did, and his frugality has affected my own adult behavior. I shop at Wal-Mart. I still buy cheap shoes, reminiscent of those thrifty Thom McAn’s of old. When possible, I fill up the tank down in Fredericksburg.
Frugality is also a major reason I have opposed measures to fight global warming. All of them seem terribly expensive, with not the least assurance of being the least bit effective. As noted climate skeptic Bjorn Lomborg has claimed, choosing the kind of future Al Gore advocates could cost, according to U.N. estimates, $553 trillion over this century—leaving in 2100 the average world inhabitant 30 percent poorer.
Frugality is why I also enjoy living in Virginia, which lately spends too freely, but at least still feels guilty about it. Our taxes are still low and we get a good bang for the buck, excepting of course our roads.
Closer to home, I hope the electric company can come up with a way to supply the needed extra power lines to assure we’ll continue to have very few blackouts here. If stringing their lines from new tall towers is the only way to keep my future electric bills from ballooning, so be it. I know the highlines are ungainly, but cheap is seldom pretty.
* Up in Washington, frugality be damned seems to be par for the course. I just wish they wouldn’t fritter away so many of our tax dollars. From representatives’ “earmarks” that fund pet projects to huge cost overruns such as in the Katrina recovery and the war in Iraq, spending is wildly out of control.
* And so glaringly ineffective. GAO recently reported that Homeland Security hasn’t even completed a risk assessment of our rail system, a preferred target of terrorists who have hit railroads in London and Madrid and India recently.
N And so dumb it’s beyond belief. Congress has just eased the repayment terms on students’ college loans and thus given our fat institutions of higher learning further reasons to keep hiking their outlandish tuition charges.
Come to think of it, government’s gross mismanagement may be one reason why billionaire Warren Buffett has already allocated much of his huge estate to favored charities. They surely will spend his money more prudently than the government, which otherwise would grab much of his wealth via estate taxes, but now won’t.
Now here come the Democrats and especially Jim Webb, our new senator so abundantly full of himself, wailing about how unfair it is that we aren’t all rich. If we were, don’t you see, then Congress could get lots more money through income taxes.
“The problem with political jokes is that they get elected.” –Will Rogers.
Webb carps about how a few rich CEOs make so much more than the rest of us. Make them all work for free? That wouldn’t cause even a wiggle in the gap between the rich and poor.
Speaking of which, Congress' Joint Economic Committee measures income inequality by something called the Gini Index.Today it’s the same as when Bush took office. (Hat tip to blogger Gerry Phelps.) But don’t take our word for it. E-mail me and I’ll send you a persuasive piece by hotshot analyst Alan Reynolds.
One final point: Frugal doesn’t mean cheap. Indeed, it’s claimed that conservative Americans give a lot more to charity and churches than liberals do.
We’re frugal, they’re cheap.
*****
(Note to Bensblurb aficionados: You can see some of my recent columns. Try blogger.com and click on
"You should see this.")